4.5 Article

Motion correction and registration of high b-value diffusion weighted images

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 1694-1702

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23186

关键词

high b-value; motion; registration; diffusion weighted MRI; white matter

资金

  1. European Commission [238292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that, high b-value diffusion weighted MRI improves the sensitivity and specificity of these images to tissue microstructure when compared with clinical b-value diffusion weighted MRI (b approximate to 1000 s/mm2). However, it suffers from poor signal to noise ratio - leading to longer acquisition times and therefore more motion artifacts. Together with the orientational sensitivity of the diffusion weighted MRI signal, the contrast at different b-values and different gradient directions is significantly different. These features of high b-value diffusion images preclude the ability to perform conventional image-registration-based motion/distortion correction. Here, we suggest a framework based on both experimental data (diffusion tensor MRI) and simulations (using the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion framework) to correct the motion induced misalignments and artifacts of high b-value diffusion weighted MRI. This approach was evaluated using visual assessment of the registered diffusion weighted MRI and the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion analysis results, as well as residual analysis to assess the quality of the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion fitting. Both qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate an improvement in fitting the data to the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion model following the suggested registration framework, thereby, addressing a long-standing problem and making the correction of motion/distortions in data collected at high b-values feasible for the first time. Magn Reson Med, 2011. (c)proves 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据