4.2 Article

Hydrogen bonds and local symmetry in the crystal structure of gibbsite

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 11, 页码 877-881

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2682

关键词

Al-27 solid-state NMR; H-1 CRAMPS; CASTEP; gibbsite; hydrogen bonding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

First-principles quantum mechanical calculations of NMR chemical shifts and quadrupolar parameters have been carried out to assign the Al-27 MAS NMR resonances in gibbsite. The Al-27 NMR spectrum shows two signals for octahedral aluminum revealing two aluminum sites coordinated by six hydroxyl groups each, although the crystallographic positions of the two Al sites show little difference. The presence of two distinguished Al-27 NMR resonances characterized by rather similar chemical shifts but quadrupolar coupling constants differing by roughly a factor of two is explained by different character of the hydrogen bonds, in which the hydroxyls forming the corresponding octahedron around each aluminum site, are involved. The Al-I site characterized by a C-Q = 4.6 MHz is surrounded by OH-groups participating in four intralayer and two interlayer hydrogen bonds, while the Al-II site with the smaller quadrupolar constant (2.2 MHz) is coordinated by hydroxides, of which two point toward the intralayer cavities and four OH-bonds are aligned toward the interlayer gallery. In high-resolution solid-state H-1 CRAMPS (combination of rotation and multiple-pulse spectroscopy) four signals with an intensity ratio of 1 : 2 : 2 : 1 are resolved which allow to distinguish six nonequivalent hydrogen sites reported in the gibbsite crystal structure and to ascribe them to two types of structural OH groups associated with intralayer and interlayer hydrogen bonds. This study can be applied to characterize the gibbsite-like layer - intergallery interactions associated with hydrogen bonding in the more complex systems, such as synthetic aluminum layered double hydroxides. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据