4.7 Article

An empirical model to describe performance degradation for warranty abuse detection in portable electronics

期刊

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 92-99

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.019

关键词

Accelerated life test; Liquid damage indicator; Performance degradation model; Warranty abuse detection

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials under R&D Program of Korea Research Council for Industrial Science Technology
  2. Mid-career Researcher Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea [2013R1A2A2A01068627]
  3. Brain Korea 21 Plus Project - Korean government
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A2A01068627] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Portable electronics makers have introduced liquid damage indicators (LDIs) into their products to detect warranty abuse caused by water damage. However, under certain conditions, these indicators can exhibit inconsistencies in detecting liquid damage. This study is motivated by the fact that the reliability of LDIs in portable electronics is suspected. In this paper, first, the scheme of life tests is devised for LDIs in conjunction with a robust color classification rule. Second, a degradation model is proposed by considering the two physical mechanisms (1) phase change from vapor to water and (2) water transport in the porous paper for LDIs. Finally, the degradation model is validated with additional tests using actual smartphone sets subjected to the thermal cycling of -15 degrees C to 25 degrees C and the relative humidity of 95%. By employing the innovative life testing scheme and the novel performance degradation model, it is expected that the performance of LDIs for a particular application can be assessed quickly and accurately. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据