4.7 Article

Influence of Diffusivity and Sorption on Helium and Hydrogen Separations in Hydrocarbon, Silicon, and Fluorocarbon-Based Polymers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 3170-3184

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma402521h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences through the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences [DE-FG02-02ER15362]
  2. DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Graduate Fellowship Program [DE-AC05-06OR23100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The permeability-selectivity upper bounds show that perfluoropolymers have uniquely different separation characteristics than hydrocarbon-based polymers. For separating helium from hydrogen, these differences are particularly dramatic. At a given helium permeability, the upper bound defined by perfluoropolymers has helium/hydrogen selectivities that are 2.5 times higher than that of the upper bound defined by hydrocarbon-based polymers. Robeson hypothesized that these differences in transport properties resulted from the unusual sorption relationships of gases in perfluoropolymers compared to hydrocarbon-based polymers, and this paper seeks to test this hypothesis experimentally. To do so, the gas permeability, sorption, and diffusion coefficients were determined at 35 degrees C for hydrogen and helium in a series of hydrocarbon-, silicon-, and fluorocarbon-based polymers. Highly or completely fluorinated polymers have separation characteristics above the upper-bound for helium/hydrogen separation because they maintain good diffusivity selectivities for helium over hydrogen and they have helium/hydrogen sorption selectivities much closer to unity than those of hydrocarbon-based samples. The silicon-based polymer had intermediate sorption selectivities between those of hydrocarbon-based polymers and perfluoropolymers. Comparisons of hydrogen and helium sorption data in the literature more broadly extend the conclusion that helium/hydrogen sorption selectivity is rather different in hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon-based media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据