4.7 Article

Synthesis of Dendronized Polymers via Macromonomer Approach by Living ROMP and Their Characterization: From Rod-Like Homopolymers to Block and Gradient Copolymers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 46, 期 15, 页码 5905-5914

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma401132u

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A7B4049677, 2012R1A1A1014680, 2010-0025236] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendronized polymers were synthesized from various endo-tricycle[4.2.2.0]deca-3,9-diene (TD) monomers, using a macromonomer approach, via ring-opening metathesis polymerization. The polymerization was achieved in a living manner to give dendronized polymers with high molecular-weights and narrow polydispersity index. The resulting polymers showed highly extended conformations both in solution and in the solid state, even with relatively small third-generation ester dendrons, because of the rigid backbone of TD monomers. Using their rigidity, block and gradient copolymers containing TD and norbornene moieties were synthesized. Diblock copolymers were produced by the sequential addition of two dendronized macromonomers, and gradient copolymers were produced in a simple batch reaction, because large differences in reactivity allowed for the simultaneous one-pot polymerization, favoring TD over norbornene. Polymer conformations were confirmed by both scattering analysis in solution and atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging in thin films. The high-resolution AFM images of both copolymers enabled us to distinguish the structural differences between the two classes of copolymers because the block copolymer showed clear boundary for each block while the gradient copolymer showed gradual changes in height and thickness. Furthermore, a comparison of the rigidities of these two copolymers was performed by scattering analysis in solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据