4.1 Article

Two-Dimensional Wang-Landau Algorithm for Osmotic Pressure Calculations in a Polyelectrolyte-Membrane System

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR THEORY AND SIMULATIONS
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 496-509

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mats.201100015

关键词

entropic sampling; membranes; Monte Carlo simulations; osmotic pressure; polyelectrolytes

资金

  1. Swedish Institute
  2. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsra det) [621-2007-5256]
  3. Russian Foundation for Fundamental research (RFFI) [02-08-0004/a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Monte Carlo method based on two-dimensional entropic sampling within the WangLandau (WL) algorithm is applied to simulation of a continuous model of a polyelectrolyte between membrane surfaces. Membranes are presented by parallel plane surfaces holding either fixed or mobile dipoles (representing lipid headgroups). A strongly charged polyion accompanied by neutralizing counterions is placed between the membranes. Periodic boundary conditions are imposed along X-and Y-axes. The volume of the main cell is varied during the simulation by shifting one of the surfaces along Z-axis. Within two-dimensional WL sampling algorithm we obtain joint density of states as a function of energy and volume in a single run. In order to increase efficiency of our calculations we introduce a number of modifications to the original WL-approach. Various properties of the system over wide temperature and volume or pressure ranges, i.e., conformational energy, heat capacity, and free energy, are obtained from the two-dimensional density of states by simple integration. The osmotic pressure is calculated as a derivative of Helmholtz free energy. Alternatively, properties of the system, including average volume, can be obtained under condition of NPT ensemble. It is shown that the both approaches produce coinciding P-osm(V) isotherms. In all considered cases we observe repulsive effective interaction between the membrane surfaces, and repulsion is stronger for the surfaces with fixed dipoles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据