4.4 Article

Discrimination factors of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes from diet to hair and scat in captive tigers (Panthera tigris) and snow leopards (Uncia uncia)

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1062-1068

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7194

关键词

-

资金

  1. Columbia University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RATIONALE: In order to use stable isotope ratio values obtained from wild animal tissues, we must accurately calculate the differences in isotope ratios between diet and consumer (delta(tissue) - delta(diet)). These values, called trophic discrimination factors (TDFs, denoted with Delta), are necessary for stable isotope ecology studies and are best calculated in controlled environments. METHODS: Scat, hair, and diet samples were collected from captive tigers (n = 8) and snow leopards (n = 10) at the Bronx Zoo. The isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen, the two most commonly used in ecological studies, of the samples were measured by continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The trophic discrimination factors were calculated for both carbon (delta C-13 values) and nitrogen (delta N-15 values). RESULTS: It was found that the only significant TDFs in this study were diet-hair, Delta C-13(Hair), for snow leopards (5.97 +/- 1.25 parts per thousand) and tigers (6.45 +/- 0.54 parts per thousand), and diet-scat, Delta N-15(Scat), in snow leopards (2.49 +/- 1.30 parts per thousand). The othermean isotope ratios were not significantly different from that of the premixed feline diet. The Delta N-15(Hair) values for both species were unusually low, potentially due to the protein content and quality of the feline diet. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination factors of the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen calculated in this study can be applied to ecological studies of wild, non-captive terrestrial mammals. The effect of protein quality in isotope discrimination is also worthy of further investigation to better understand variation in TDFs. Carnivore scat is shown to be a valuable material for isotopic analysis. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据