4.5 Article

Differential effects of IL-2 and IL-21 on expansion of the CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T regulatory cells with redundant roles in natural killer cell mediated antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

MABS
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 35-41

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/mabs.2.1.10561

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukemia; IL-21; IL-2; immunosuppression; antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA95426]
  2. [T-32-5CA009338]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA095426, T32CA009338] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells are expanded in solid and hematological malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Several cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules are required for generation, survival and maintenance of their suppressive effect. We and others have shown direct cytotoxic effect of the novel common gamma chain cytokine interleukin (IL)-21 on primary B cells from CLL patients. Since members of this family of cytokines are known to exhibit their effects on diverse immune cells, we have examined the effects of IL-21 on CLL patient derived regulatory T cell (Treg) induction, expansion and the inhibitory effect on natural killer cells in vitro. We demonstrate here the expression of IL-21 receptor in CD4(+)CD25(High) regulatory cells from CLL patients. In contrast to IL-2, the IL-21 cytokine failed to mediate expansion of regulatory T cells or induced expression of Foxp3 in CD4+CD25(Intermediate) or CD4(+)CD25(Dim/-)T cells in whole blood derived from CLL patients. Interestingly, in contrast to their differential effects on expansion of the CD4(+)CD25 Foxp31cells, IL-2 and IL-21 exhibited a redundant role in Treg mediated suppression of NK cell mediated antibody dependent cytotoxicity function. Given the infusion related toxicities and pro-survival effect of IL-2 in CLL, these studies provide a rationale to explore IL-21 as an alternate gamma chain cytokine in CLL therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据