4.7 Article

A bacteriocin-like substance produced from Lactobacillus pentosus 39 is a natural antagonist for the control of Aeromonas hydrophila and Listeria monocytogenes in fresh salmon fillets

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 604-611

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.10.012

关键词

Antibacterial activity; Seafood; Lactobacillus pentosus; Aeromonas hydrophila; Listeria monocytogenes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the ability of Lactobacillus pentosus 39, a BLS (Bacteriocin-like substance)-producing strain, to control the growth of Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC 14715 and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19117 artificially added to fresh salmon fillets at refrigeration temperatures and under simulated cold-chain break conditions. At refrigeration temperatures, Lb. pentosus 39 protective culture and its putative bacteriocin significantly reduced A. hydrophila counts compared with the control (2.1 and 1.4 log CFU/g reductions, respectively). Similar behaviour was observed for L monocytogenes (3.6 and 1.3 log CFU/g reductions, respectively).Under simulated cold-chain break conditions, an increase in temperature (30 degrees C for 12h) produced an evident increase in the development of A. hydrophila, L monocytogenes, but also of Lb. pentosus 39, with a consequent increase in BLS production. This condition resulted in a greater reduction of both pathogens compared with samples stored at 4 degrees C throughout the experiment (2.8 log CFU/g reduction for A. hydrophila, 5.8 log CFU/g reduction for L monocytogenes). In samples treated with the putative bacteriocin alone, a less marked decrease was observed. Our study demonstrates the capability of Lb. pentosus 39 to control the growth of psychrotrophic bacteria in an experimental seafood model system. A similar biopreservation technology could provide more prolonged shelf-life during storage of ready-to-eat seafood, ensuring safety, even under extreme conditions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据