4.3 Article

SLEDAI-2K 10 days versus SLEDAI-2K 30 days in a longitudinal evaluation

期刊

LUPUS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 67-70

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203310385163

关键词

disease activity; lupus; SLEDAI-2K

资金

  1. Centre for Prognosis Studies in The Rheumatic Diseases
  2. Smythe Foundation, Lupus Flare Foundation, Lupus Ontario
  3. Arthritis Centre of Excellence
  4. Geoff Carr Lupus Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the study was to evaluate SLEDAI-2K 30 days over time and to compare with the original SLEDAI-2K 10 days. Forty-one patients seen at The University of Toronto Lupus Clinic were followed at monthly intervals for 12 months. The SLEDAI-2K score was completed twice, once for a 10-day window and again for a 30-day window using the same definitions for the descriptors. Four hundred and nineteen patient-visits in 41 patients were recorded for both SLEDAI-2K for a 10-day and a 30-day window. One hundred and fifty-one patient-visits had a SLEDAI-2K activity score of 0 and 268 patient-visits had varying levels of disease activity in the range 1-15. In all but one patient-visit there was an agreement between the SLEDAI-2K 10 days and 30 days. SLEDAI-2K 30 days scores were concordant with SLEDAI-2K 10 days scores, both in patients in remission and in patients with a spectrum of disease activity levels followed monthly over 1 year. SLEDAI-2K 30 days was validated against SLEDAI-2K 10 days in a longitudinal evaluation over 1 year. We recommend the use of SLEDAI-2K 30 days in clinical studies and clinical trials. Lupus (2011) 20, 67-70.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据