4.4 Article

Variation in plant preferences of indigenous goats in a False Thornveld rangeland in South Africa

期刊

LIVESTOCK SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 3, 页码 206-212

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.01.009

关键词

Goat genotypes; Seasonal changes; Micro-histological faecal technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant preference of three goat genotypes; Xhosa lop-eared (XLE), Nguni (NGN) and Nguni x Boer crossbred (NBC) was studied using the micro-histological faecal analysis technique. Faecal samples were collected per rectum of goats in four seasons; hot-dry (September to October), hot-wet (November to February), cold-dry (June to August), and post-rainy season (March to May). Plant fragments were identified using a microscope at 400x magnification. Greater proportions (P<0.05) of A. karroo fragments were identified in faeces of the XLE goats in the hot-dry season compared to NGN and NBC goats. The NBC goats had a higher (P<0.05) proportion of Sporobolus africanus and S. fimbriatus in faeces compared to other genotypes. No significant differences (P>0.05) were found on the proportion of plant fragments identified in faeces of all goat genotypes during hot-wet season. The NBC goats had low (P < 0.05) proportions of plant fragments of Diospyros lycioides and Ehretia rigida identified in faeces and had a higher proportion of Sporobolus africanus in the cold-dry season compared to NGN and XLE goats. The XLE and NBC goat genotypes had higher proportions of S. fimbriatus and Panicum maximum plant fragments during the post-rainy season. Grewia occidentalis, P. maximum and D. lycioides had greater preference index values for all goat genotypes, compared to other plant species. The XLE goats selected more browse than herbaceous plant species compared to other genotypes. Xhosa lop-eared goats, therefore, show a potential to browse more than the NGN and NBC goats. Use of the XLE goats in mixed livestock system with livestock species perceived to be grazers on rangelands of the False Thornveld is recommended. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据