4.2 Article

Reduction of Rat Cardiac Hypertrophy by Osthol is Related to Regulation of Cardiac Oxidative Stress and Lipid Metabolism

期刊

LIPIDS
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 987-994

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-012-3710-1

关键词

Osthol; Cardiac hypertrophy; Hypertension; Oxidative stress; Lipid metabolism

资金

  1. Science and Technology Fund of Suzhou City [SWG0903]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic effect of osthol, a coumarin compound isolated from the fruit of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson, on cardiac hypertrophy in rats and investigate its potential mechanisms. The rats with cardiac hypertrophy induced by renovascular hypertension were given osthol orally by gavage for 4 weeks. The results showed that in the osthol 20 mg/kg group, the blood pressure, heart weight index and myocardial malondialdehyde content were lowered (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 and p = 0.025, respectively), the myocardial superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase contents were increased (p < 0.001), and the elevated unesterified fatty acids and triacylglycerols in myocardial tissues were decreased (p = 0.017 and p = 0.004, respectively). At the same time, the myocardial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT)-1a mRNA expressions were increased and the myocardial diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) mRNA expression was decreased in the osthol 20 mg/kg group (p < 0.001). Osthol treatment was associated with a decreased cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that osthol may exert a therapeutic effect on cardiac hypertrophy in rats, and its mechanisms may be related to the improvement of myocardial oxidative stress and lipid metabolism via regulation of PPAR alpha-mediated target gene expressions including an increase in CPT-1a mRNA expression and a decrease in DGAT mRNA expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据