4.3 Article

Improved methodology to measure taxon-specific phosphate uptake in live and unfiltered samples

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 443-453

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2011.9.443

关键词

-

资金

  1. LEFE-CYBER (Les Enveloppes Fluides et L'Environnement)
  2. SESAME
  3. French Research and Education Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microorganisms play a major role in the marine phosphate biogeochemical cycle but the relative contribution of picoplanktonic groups is not well understood. Previous studies have shown that combining uptake measurements of radiolabeled dissolved inorganic phosphate (P-i) substrate with cell sorting by flow cytometry is a powerful tool for the assessment of P-i fluxes at the cell-specific level. Nevertheless, using P-33 to trace P-i uptake, we show that treatments involving fixation and filtration of the sorted groups (i.e., heterotrophic prokaryotes, Synechococcus and piconanophytoeukaryotes) induce leakage of radioactive P-i (up to 50% of the signal), resulting in a sizeable underestimation of the taxon-specific P-i uptake. We suggest an alternative protocol, which significantly reduces this bias. Using this optimized protocol, the samples were treated with an excess of nonradioactive P-i to stop the incubation and sorted fractions were directly collected in microtubes for radioactivity counting, avoiding signal loss due to filtration. Sorted groups were strongly and differently impacted by fixation (0.5% PFA), with the exception of Synechococcus cells, which showed once a 10% lower signal in samples treated with the previously used protocols compared with samples treated with ours. Based on the integrity of the live sorted cells, our improved protocol provides reproducible and accurate estimations of the taxon-specific P-i uptake (<= 11% variation on cellular uptake rates, sd/average, n = 69). It was successfully applied to P-depleted oligotrophic seawater samples from the Mediterranean and will allow a comparison of taxon-specific uptake rates between sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据