4.7 Article

Magnitudes and controls of organic and inorganic carbon flux through a chain of hard-water lakes on the northern Great Plains

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 1551-1564

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1551

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chair
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. University of Regina
  5. Province of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole-lake carbon (C) mass-balance budgets were constructed for a chain of six hard-water lakes to quantify the relative importance of organic carbon (OC) and inorganic carbon (IC) exchanges between atmosphere, water column, sediments, and rivers. Mean summer C fluxes were calculated for each lake during the ice-free periods (May to September) of 1995-2007 by measuring deposition of IC and OC in lake sediments, export of C to outflow rivers, lotic C influxes, and atmospheric exchange of CO2. Unlike soft-water lakes, IC in rivers accounted for 68.2-85.6% of total C (TC) influx to these hard-water lakes, CO2 efflux accounted for 0-44.5% of total C export (median 2.8%), and sedimentation buried similar amounts of OC and IC. Deposition of C in sediments accounted for 1.8-61.7% of total export and was correlated to water residence time, while C efflux through rivers accounted for 32.6-98.2% of total export, mainly as IC (69.6-85.1% of TC). Unexpectedly, estimates of net ecosystem production based on OC mass balances suggested that all lakes were autotrophic (production > respiration) during summer, despite elevated dissolved organic carbon content (5.6-16.1 mg C L-1), pCO(2) values, and net CO2 emissions to the atmosphere from three lakes. We conclude that C fluxes within and among these hard-water lakes are regulated by hydrologic inputs of dissolved IC rather than by lake metabolism, IC and OC pathways are only loosely coupled, and future climate variability will alter C fluxes in similar lakes mainly through regulation of mass transfer from land.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据