4.7 Article

Decadal diagenetic effects on δ13C and δ15N studied in varved lake sediment

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 917-924

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.3.0917

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Faculty of Science and Technology, Umea University
  3. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the long-term (27 yr) effects of sediment aging on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values (delta C-13 and delta N-15), we used a collection of eight freeze cores of annually laminated (varved) lake sediment collected from 1979 to 2007 in Nylandssjon (northern Sweden). Previous research has shown that 20-23% of carbon and 35% of nitrogen is lost in 27 yr. Material from specific years was compared in the cores, e. g., delta C-13 and delta N-15 of the surface varve of the 1979 core was followed in cores retrieved in 1980, 1989, 1993, 2002, 2004, and 2006. delta C-13 increased by 0.4-1.5% during the first 5 yr. After this initial increase, only minor fluctuations were recorded. There is a good correlation between the magnitude in delta C-13 changes and the initial carbon and nitrogen concentrations, indicating that the initial sediment composition is important for the C-13 fractionation. delta N-15 gradually decreased by 0.3-0.7% over the entire 27-yr period. The lack of correlation with the initial sediment composition and the gradual decrease in delta N-15 indicates a microbial control on delta N-15 change. The diagenetic changes in the stable isotope values that occur in Nylandssjon are small, but of the same magnitude as the down-core variation in the varves deposited 1950-2006. Diagenetic effects should be considered when delta C-13 and delta N-15 are used to study organic matter sources or paleoproductivity, especially when dealing with recent trends or small changes. Based on our findings, diagenetic effects for delta C-13 are observed during the first 5-10 yr, whereas no delimitation can be recommended for delta N-15.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据