4.1 Article

Shading effects of free-floating plants on drainage-ditch invertebrates

期刊

LIMNOLOGY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 225-235

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10201-013-0416-x

关键词

Anoxia; Dissolved oxygen concentration; Disturbance; Environmental stress; Agroecosystems

资金

  1. REFRESH nr. EU FP7 collaborative project Adaptive Strategies to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change on European Freshwater Ecosystems (REFRESH) [244121]
  2. Foundation of Applied Water Research (STOWA)
  3. strategic research program Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions - Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Food Quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In small, lentic ecosystems in agricultural areas, eutrophication often results in excessive growth of small, free-floating plants. A dense layer of plants on the water surface changes the underwater light climate drastically and in turn leads to hypoxic or even anoxic conditions. Knowledge of the effects on macroinvertebrates of reduced light conditions and oxygen stress as result of eutrophication is limited. We thus examined in a field situation the influence of an unpredictable, 10-day period of low oxygen availability as a result of poor underwater light conditions. In a before-after control-impact design, the underwater light climate and dissolved oxygen concentration of ditch sections were manipulated, and the macroinvertebrate assemblage composition was recorded during the 4 weeks before and after treatment. A poor underwater light climate in combination with normoxic conditions did not affect the invertebrate assemblage composition, but the combination of low-light intensity and anoxic conditions did alter it. Interestingly, these changes were not apparent directly after treatment but developed in the weeks following, indicating that although the invertebrates could cope with a shading-induced period of hypoxia, costs were associated with the event over a longer time period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据