4.3 Article

Immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pair measurement is associated with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 1898-1907

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.767456

关键词

Lymphoma and Hodgkin disease; prognostication; chemotherapeutic approaches

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated serum free light chains (FLCs) have been associated with an unfavorable prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of a quantitative assessment of intact circulating immunoglobulin (Ig), using serum Ig heavy chain/light chain pair (HLC) measurements in patients with DLBCL. FLC and HLC were measured in 409 serum samples of patients with DLBCL included in the LNH03-B clinical trial program of the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Patients with an abnormal IgM kappa/IgM lambda ratio or an abnormal FLC ratio more frequently displayed adverse clinical characteristics. Patients with abnormal IgM kappa/IgM lambda ratios had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as compared to patients with a normal ratio in the overall cohort (5-year PFS 44.9% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.0003 and 5-year OS 50.8% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.0003) and in the R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) cohort (5-year OS 43.5% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, including elevated FLC/HLC and International Prognostic Index (IPI), an abnormal IgM kappa/IgM lambda ratio (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.3, p = 0.03) remained predictive of shorter progression-free survival. Gene expression profile experiments and immunohistochemistry indicate that this measurement is at least partially related to tumor cell secretion. Both elevated serum FLCs and an abnormal IgM kappa/IgM lambda ratio are associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with DLBCL treated by R-CHOP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据