4.7 Article

The different epidemiologic subtypes of Burkitt lymphoma share a homogenous micro RNA profile distinct from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1869-1876

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.156

关键词

Burkitt lymphoma; epidemiological variants; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; micro RNA profiling

资金

  1. German High Grade Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNL)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Transregio 54 (TRR54)]
  3. Fondazione Monte dei Paschi (MPS)
  4. Kinderkrebsinitiative Buchholz / Holm-Seppensen
  5. Deutsche Krebshilfe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL) can be delineated from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by a very homogeneous mRNA expression signature. However, it remained unclear whether all three BL variants sBL, endemic BL (eBL) and human immunodeficiency virus-associated BL (HIV-BL)-represent a uniform biological entity despite their differences in geographical occurrence, association with immunodeficiency and/or incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. To address this issue, we generated micro RNA (miRNA) profiles from 18 eBL, 31 sBL and 15 HIV-BL cases. In addition, we analyzed the miRNA expression of 86 DLBCL to determine whether miRNA profiles recapitulate the molecular differences between BL and DLBCL evidenced by mRNA profiling. A signature of 38 miRNAs containing MYC regulated and nuclear factor-kB pathway-associated miRNAs was obtained that differentiated BL from DLBCL. The miRNA profiles of sBL and eBL displayed only six differentially expressed miRNAs, whereas HIV and EBV infection had no impact on the miRNA profile of BL. In conclusion, miRNA profiling confirms that BL and DLBCL represent distinct lymphoma categories and demonstrates that the three BL variants are representatives of the same biological entity with only marginal miRNA expression differences between eBL and sBL. Leukemia (2011) 25, 1869-1876; doi:10.1038/leu.2011.156; published online 24 June 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据