4.7 Article

Single-cell analysis reveals oligoclonality among 'low-count' monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 133-140

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.192

关键词

monoclonal B lymphocytosis; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; B-cell repertoire; human B cells

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NCI) [AI-51445, R03 CA128030]
  2. Bernstein Fund for Leukemia Research
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R03CA128030] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P30AI051445] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a preclinical hematologic syndrome characterized by small accumulations of CD5+ B lymphocytes. Most MBL share phenotypic characteristics with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although some MBL progress to CLL, most MBL have apparently limited potential for progression to CLL, particularly those MBL with normal absolute B-cell counts ('low-count' MBL). Most CLL are monoclonal and it is not known whether MBL are monoclonal or oligoclonal; this is important because it is unclear whether MBL represent indolent CLL or represent a distinct premalignant precursor before the development of CLL. We used flow cytometry analysis and sorting to determine immunophenotypic characteristics, clonality and molecular features of MBL from familial CLL kindreds. Single-cell analysis indicated four of six low-count MBL consisted of two or more unrelated clones; the other two MBL were monoclonal. 87% of low-count MBL clones had mutated immunoglobulin genes, and no immunoglobulin heavy-chain rearrangements of VH family 1 were observed. Some MBL were diversified, clonally related populations with evidence of antigen drive. We conclude that although low-count MBL share many phenotypic characteristics with CLL, many MBL are oligoclonal. This supports a model for step-wise development of MBL into CLL. Leukemia (2010) 24, 133-140; doi:10.1038/leu.2009.192; published online 15 October 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据