4.3 Article

Evaluation of indigenous bacterial strains for biocontrol of the frogeye leaf spot of soya bean caused by Cercospora sojina

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 170-173

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03266.x

关键词

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; biological control; Cercospora sojina; frogeye leaf spot; Pseudomonas fluorescens

资金

  1. 'Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (FONCYT) [PICT2007/443]
  2. UBACyT proyect [20020100100493]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Assessment of biological control of Cercospora sojina, causal agent of frogeye leaf spot (FLS) of soya bean, using three indigenous bacterial strains, BNM297 (Pseudomonas fluorescens), BNM340 and BNM122 (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens). Methods and Results: From cultures of each bacterial strain, cell suspensions and cell-free supernatants were obtained and assayed to determine their antifungal activity against C. sojina. Both mycelial growth and spore germination in vitro were more strongly inhibited by bacterial cell suspensions than by cell-free supernatants. The Bacillus strains BNM122 and BNM340 inhibited the fungal growth to a similar degree (I 5253%), while cells from P. fluorescens BNM297 caused a lesser reduction (I 3234%) in the fungus colony diameter. The foliar application of the two Bacillus strains on soya bean seedlings, under greenhouse conditions, significantly reduced the disease severity with respect to control soya bean seedlings and those sprayed with BNM297. This last bacterial strain was not effective in controlling FLS in vivo. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that the application of antagonistic bacteria may be a promising and environmentally friendly alternative to control the FLS of soya bean. Significance and Impact of the Study: To our knowledge, this is the first report of biological control of C. sojina by using native Bacillus strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据