4.5 Article

Use of Olfactory Training in Post-Traumatic and Postinfectious Olfactory Dysfunction

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 123, 期 12, 页码 E85-E90

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24390

关键词

Anosmia; post-traumatic; postinfectious; olfactory training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/HypothesisThere is evidence that the olfactory system can be modulated by repeated exposure to odors, a procedure called olfactory training. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of olfactory training in patients with postinfectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. Study DesignProspective study of 119 patients with postinfectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. MethodsTwo groups of patients (postinfectious and post-traumatic) performed the olfactory training (n=49 and n=23, respectively) over a period of 16 weeks and were compared with two control groups of the same etiology (n=32 and n=15). Patients with sinunasal, neurologic, or idiopathic disease were excluded. Training was performed twice daily with the use of four odors (phenyl ethyl alcohol [rose], eucalyptol [eucalyptus], citronellal [lemon], and eugenol [cloves]). Olfactory testing was performed by means of the Sniffin' Sticks test battery (threshold, discrimination, identification) at the time of diagnosis, and 8 and 16 weeks later. All patients evaluated their olfactory function by means of a visual analogue scale (0-100). ResultsCompared to controls, training patients in both groups presented significantly higher scores of olfactory function as measured by the Sniffin' Sticks test. This increase was measured in 67.8% of postinfectious and 33.2% of post-traumatic patients. Subjective ratings were in accordance with the olfactory test results. Subset analysis showed that olfactory function mainly increased olfactory identification followed by discrimination in both training groups. ConclusionsThe present study suggests that a 16-week short-term exposure to specific odors may increase olfactory sensitivity in patients with postinfectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. Level of Evidence3b. Laryngoscope, 123:E85-E90, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据