4.5 Article

Gefitinib (Iressa) Potentiates the Effect of Ionizing Radiation in Thyroid Cancer Cell Lines

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 118, 期 8, 页码 1372-1376

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318172aae4

关键词

Gefitinib; Iressa; anaplastic thyroid cancer; follicular cancer; epidermal; growth factor receptor; metastasis; ionizing radiation.

资金

  1. Bell Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis: To determine whether inactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase activity will sensitize thyroid cancer cell lines to ionizing radiation-induced death. Study Design: Established human thyroid cancer cells lines were studied. Methods: Colony formation assay was used to determine the effect of Gefitinib, a small molecule inhibitor of EGFR, on anaplastic (ARO) and follicular (WRO) thyroid cancer cell lines. In addition, colony formation assay was used to determine the effect of ionizing radiation in the presence or absence of Gefitinib. EGFR protein expression on the cell lines and inactivation of EGFR kinase by Gefitinib was analyzed by Western blot. Immunohistochemistry was performed on archived thyroid cancer tissue to demonstrate expression of EGFR. Results: Incubation with Gefitinib caused decreased phosphorylation of EGFR protein in,established thyroid cancer cell lines as measured by Western blot. Inhibition of EGFR kinase activity by Gefitinib resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in colony formation in both ARO and WRO thyroid cancer cell lines. Addition of Gefitinib in combination with ionizing radiation reduced cell proliferation in ARO (P = .0084) and WRO (P = .0252) as measured by colony formation assay. Conclusions: Inactivation of the EGFR kinase by Gefitinib potentiates the ionizing radiation-induced inhibition of cell proliferation in thyroid cancer cell lines. Use of this combination treatment of Gefitinib and ionizing radiation may be a promising therapy for anaplastic thyroid and metastatic follicular thyroid cancer and should be extended into animal models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据