4.6 Article

Electrospray Ionization Deposition of Ultrathin Ionic Liquid Films: [C8C1Im]Cl and [C8C1Im][Tf2N] on Au(111)

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 1063-1071

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la404429q

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG through the Cluster of Excellence Engineering of Advanced Materials
  2. DFG [STE 620/9-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new method for preparing ultrathin ionic liquid (IL) films on surfaces by means of electrospray ionization deposition (ESID) under ultraclean and well-defined ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) conditions. In contrast to physical vapor deposition (PVD) of ILs under UHV, ESID even allows deposition of ILs, which are prone to thermal decomposition. As proof of concept, we first investigated ultrathin [C(8)C(1)Im][Tf2N] (=1-methyl-3-octyl imidazolium bis(trifluoromethyl)imide) films on Au(111) by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS). Films obtained by ESID are found to be virtually identical to films grown by standard PVD. Thereafter, ESID of [C(8)C(1)Im]Cl on Au(111) was studied as a first example of an IL that cannot be prepared as ultrathin film otherwise. [C(8)C(1)Im]Cl forms a wetting layer with a checkerboard arrangement with the cationic imidazolium ring and the chloride anion adsorbed next to each other on the substrate and the alkyl chain pointing toward vacuum. This arrangement within the wetting layer is similar to that observed for [C(8)C(1)Im][Tf2N], albeit with a higher degree of order of the alkyl chains. Further deposition of [C(8)C(1)Im]Cl leads to a pronounced island growth on top of the wetting layer, which is independently confirmed by ARXPS and atomic force microscopy. This behavior contrasts the growth behavior found for [C8C,Itn][Tf2N], where layer-by-layer growth on top of the wetting layer is observed. The dramatic difference between both ILs is attributed to differences in the cation anion interactions and in the degree of order in the wetting layer of the two ILs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据