4.6 Article

Characterizing Ultrathin and Thick Organic Layers by Surface Plasmon Resonance Three-Wavelength and Waveguide Mode Analysis

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 29, 期 27, 页码 8561-8571

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la401084w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [137053, 1140980]
  2. Foundation of Anja and Mirja Tissari from the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Suomen Kulttuurirahasto)
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [137053, 137053] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-wavelength angular-scanning surface plasmon resonance based analysis has been utilized for characterizing optical properties of organic nanometer-thick layers with a wide range of thicknesses. The thickness and refractive index were determined for sample layers with thicknesses ranging from subnanometer to hundreds of nanometers. The analysis approach allows for simultaneous determination of both the refractive index and thickness without prior knowledge of either the refractive index or the thickness of the sample layers and without the help of other instruments, as opposed to current methods and approaches for characterizing optical properties of organic nanometer-thick layers The applicability of the three-wavelength angular-scanning surface plasmon resonance approach for characterizing thin and thick organic layers was demonstrated by ex situ deposited mono- and multilayers of stearic acid and hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine and in situ layer-by-layer deposition of two different polyelectrolyte multilayer systems. In addition to the three-wavelength angular-scanning surface plasmon resonance, approach, another surface plasmon resonance optical phenomenon, i.e., the surface plasmon resonance waveguide mode, was,, utilized to characterize organic sample layers whose thicknesses border the micrometer scale. This was demonstrated by characterizing both in situ layer-by-layer deposited polyelectrolyte, multilayer,systems and an ex situ deposited spin-coated, polymer layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据