4.6 Article

Binary Interactions and Salt-Induced Coalescence of Spherical Micelles of Cationic Surfactants from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 1127-1135

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la203745d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1049454]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  3. State of New York
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1049454] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A direct estimation of salt-mediated potential of mean force (PMF) between spherical micelles of cationic surfactants is obtained for the first time using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Coarse-grained (CG) potentials benchmarked in an earlier study [Langmuir, 2011, 27(11), 6628-6638] are used to model a binary system of cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) surfactant micelles at varying concentrations of sodium chloride (NaCl) or sodium salicylate (NaSal). The shape and structure of micelles are not subject to external constraints. NaSal is significantly more efficient in screening the intermicelle repulsive interactions shown by the PMF compared to NaCl due to a stronger binding of salicylate counterions to the micelle corona. Upon contact with each other, the micelles coalesce in the presence of NaSal to form a cylindrical structure which is stabilized by the adsorbed salicylate anions. Comparison of the PMF with Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) potentials shows qualitative agreement, while the magnitude of PMF is significantly greater than that of the DLVO potentials. To understand this discrepancy, PMF is evaluated by turning off (a) long-ranged electrostatic interactions and (b) solvent polarizability. The above effects are shown to play an important role in determining the solvent-mediated and ion-correlated interactions between the two micelles, which are not explicitly captured by mean-field double layer theories such as DLVO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据