4.6 Article

Cationic Ligand Protection: A Novel Strategy for One-Pot Preparation of Narrow-Dispersed Aqueous CdS Spheres

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 25, 期 17, 页码 10237-10242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la9010407

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [20534040, 20704014, 20731160002]
  2. 973 Program of China [2007CB936402, 2009CB939701]
  3. FANEDD of China [200734]
  4. Program of Technological Progress of Jilin Province [20080101]
  5. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry of CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to prepare the building blocks with middle refractive index for fabricating colloidal crystals, a new strategy of cationic ligand protection (CLP) was developed for one-pot preparation of narrow-dispersed CAS spheres with tunable sizes (94-303 nm) and good aqueous dispersibility. The key of CLP strategy is controlling the aggregation behavior of small US nanocrystals (NCs) via automatic control of the ligand modification condition at different reaction stages, which is realized by selecting gradual decomposition of thioacetamide (TAA) as the anionic precursor and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) cations as the ligands for anions. Accordingly, at the initial stage of the reaction when TAA decomposes incompletely, the surface atoms of the US NCs are mainly Cd cations, leaving less anionic sites for the coordination of ligands. The poor ligand modification condition of US NCs still leads to their aggregation. Along with the decomposition of TAA, S anions and cationic ligands gradually dominate the surface of US aggregates, providing the aggregates sufficient protection, and thus, they are stably dispersed in water. The current CLP strategy simultaneously involves the processes of NC formation and NC assembly and therefore promotes the one-pot preparation of NC aggregates. The as-prepared US spheres possess uniform size, good water-dispersibility, and relative higher refractive index and thus can be applied for fabricating colloidal crystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据