Prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a random forest methodology
出版年份 2015 全文链接
标题
Prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a random forest methodology
作者
关键词
Prognosis, Quality of life, Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Metastatic
出版物
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1713-1723
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2015-11-28
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1198-x
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Guidelines for time-to-event end-point definitions in trials for pancreatic cancer. Results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event End-points in CANcer trials)
- (2014) Franck Bonnetain et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine alone or alternating with FOLFIRI.3 (irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil) in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An AGEO randomised phase II study (FIRGEM)
- (2014) Isabelle Trouilloud et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
- (2014) Jacques Ferlay et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Optimal Cut Points for Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scales: Utility for Clinical Trials and Updates of Prognostic Systems in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- (2014) M. Diouf et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Sample Size Considerations of Prediction-Validation Methods in High-Dimensional Data for Survival Outcomes
- (2013) Herbert Pang et al. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Prognostic value of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, LDH and bilirubin levels in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a multicenter, pooled analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy
- (2013) Michael Haas et al. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
- (2012) T. Seufferlein et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Random forests for genomic data analysis
- (2012) Xi Chen et al. GENOMICS
- Impact of FOLFIRINOX Compared With Gemcitabine on Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results From the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 Randomized Trial
- (2012) Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- The added value of quality of life (QoL) for prognosis of overall survival in patients with palliative hepatocellular carcinoma
- (2012) Momar Diouf et al. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
- Longitudinal Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment Implications for Prognosis in Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer
- (2012) Donald P. Braun et al. PANCREAS
- Can changes in health related quality of life scores predict survival in stages III and IV colorectal cancer?
- (2011) Donald P Braun et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Estimating prognosis and palliation based on tumour marker CA 19-9 and quality of life indicators in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy
- (2010) J Bernhard et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- High-Dimensional Variable Selection for Survival Data
- (2010) Hemant Ishwaran et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Pancreatic Cancer
- (2010) Manuel Hidalgo NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Random survival forests
- (2008) Hemant Ishwaran et al. Annals of Applied Statistics
- Conditional Variable Importance for Random Forests
- (2008) Carolin Strobl et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials
- (2008) Carolyn C. Gotay et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Prognostic factor analysis of health-related quality of life data in cancer: a statistical methodological evaluation
- (2008) ME Mauer et al. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started