4.7 Review

Exploring the role of vegetation fragmentation on aquatic conditions: Linking upland with riparian areas in Puget Sound lowland streams

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 90, 期 1-2, 页码 66-75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.016

关键词

Riparian and watershed; Vegetation patterns; Urban watershed management; B-IBI; Land use planning

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's integrated Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A controversial issue in managing urbanizing watersheds is determining the scale at which conservation measures should be implemented. Current best practices suggest establishing riparian buffers along stream corridors and limiting impervious surfaces to prevent degradation of instream biological conditions. While there is increasing evidence that the amount of land covers (e.g., impervious surface, vegetation) has an impact on instream aquatic conditions, the effect of upland vegetation fragmentation on aquatic conditions requires further study. By using landscape metrics to quantity vegetation amount and distribution at the riparian and watershed scales, and a macroinvertebrate index to describe aquatic conditions. this study presents empirical evidence about the interactions between riparian and upland vegetation as they affect instream biological condition of 51 nested watersheds in the Puget Sound lowland. We ask if the fragmentation of vegetation within a watershed helps predict instream biological condition. In addition, we hypothesize that the fragmentation of vegetation at the riparian and watershed scales affects instream biological condition. Using parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses to test relationships, our findings suggest that the fragmentation of upland vegetation and the total amount of riparian vegetation explain the greatest amount of variation in aquatic conditions. These results help frame a management approach for conserving upland areas of vegetation through the use of land use planning techniques. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据