4.7 Article

Prognostic factors for time to treatment failure and time to 12 months of remission for patients with focal epilepsy: post-hoc, subgroup analyses of data from the SANAD trial

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 331-340

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70018-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (UK)
  2. Health Technology Assessment programme (HTA)
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0606-1062]
  4. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0606-1062] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  5. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0606-1062] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disorder, with outcomes ranging from immediate remission after taking a first antiepileptic drug to frequent unremitting seizures with multiple treatment failures. Few prognostic models enable prediction of outcome; we therefore aimed to use data from the SANAD study to predict outcome overall and for patients receiving specific treatments. Methods The SANAD study was a randomised controlled trial in which standard antiepileptic drugs were compared with new treatments. Arm A included patients for whom carbamazepine was considered the first-line treatment, most of whom were newly diagnosed with focal epilepsy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Outcomes were time to treatment failure overall, because of inadequate seizure control, and because of adverse events, and time to 12 months of remission from seizures. In this post-hoc study we used regression multivariable modelling to investigate how clinical factors affect the probability of treatment failure and the probability of achieving 12 months of remission. Findings For time to treatment failure, we identified several significant risk factors: sex (male vs female, hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), treatment history (taking non-SANAD antiepileptic drugs [other than those listed above] vs treatment naive, 1.27, 1.05-1.53), age (eg, older than 71 years vs 10 years or younger, 0.68, 0.51-0.91), total number of seizures (eg, four toll seizures vs two or fewer, 1.08, 1-05-1.11), electroencephalogram results (epileptiform abnormality vs normal, 1.26, 1.07-1-50), seizure type (eg, secondary generalised vs simple or complex partial only, 0.78, 0.66-0.91), site of onset (not localised vs temporal lobe, 1.25, 1.06-1.47), and treatment (lamotrigine vs carbamazepine, 0.76, 0.61-0.95). Significant factors for time to 12 months of remission were sex (male vs female, 1.19, 1.05-1.35), treatment history (taking a non-SANAD antiepileptic drug vs treatment naive, 0.64, 0.52-0.78), age (eg, older than 71 years vs 10 years or younger, 1.60, 1.26-2.03), time from first seizure (60-239 months vs 2 months, 1.14, 1.01-1.29; >240 months vs <= 2 months, 1.39, 1.04-1.86), neurological insult (presentv absent, 0.75, 0.61-0.93), total number of seizures before randomisation (eg, four to 11 vs two or fewer, 0.87, 0.85-0.90), and treatment (gabapentin vs carbamazepine, 0.71, 0.59-0.86; topiramate vs carbamazepine, 0.81, 0.68-0.98). Interpretation We present a thorough investigation of prognostic factors from a large randomised controlled trial in patients starting antiepileptic monotherapy. If validated, our models could aid in individual patient risk stratification and the design and analysis of epilepsy trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据