4.3 Review

Health effects of cow's milk consumption in infants up to 3 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 293-307

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015001354

关键词

Cow's milk consumption; Infants; Systematic review

资金

  1. Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES)
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Health
  3. Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To summarize the best available evidence regarding the short- and long-term health effects of cow's milk intake in healthy, full-term infants up to 3 years of age. Design We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library between 1960 and July 2013 and manually reviewed reference lists of pertinent articles. Two researchers independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted relevant data. Subjects We included (randomized/non-randomized) controlled trials and observational studies. Results We included data from twenty-three studies (one randomized controlled trial, four non-randomized controlled trials, eight case-control studies and ten cohort studies) for the evidence synthesis. Pooled results of four studies revealed a higher risk of Fe-deficiency anaemia for infants consuming cow's milk compared with those consuming follow-on formula (relative risk=376; 95 % CI 273, 519). For type 1 diabetes mellitus, six out of seven case-control studies did not show a difference in the risk of developing this disease based on the age of introduction of cow's milk. We did not find negative associations for other health effects. Conclusions Cow's milk consumption in infancy is associated with an increased risk of developing Fe-deficiency anaemia. Limiting cow's milk consumption may be important to ensure an adequate Fe intake for infants and toddlers. High-quality patient information for caregivers is needed on how infants' Fe requirements can be met.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据