4.7 Article

Sub-micrometer-precision, three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing via microfluidic drifting

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 415-423

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3lc50810b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1DP2OD007209-01]
  2. American Asthma Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [ECCS-0824183, ECCS-0801922]
  4. Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science (MRSEC) [DMR-0820404]
  5. NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
  6. NSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we demonstrate single-layered, microfluidic drifting based three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing devices with particle/cell focal positioning approaching submicron precision along both lateral and vertical directions. By systematically optimizing channel geometries and sample/sheath flow rates, a series of microfluidic drifting based 3D hydrodynamic focusing devices with different curvature angles are designed and fabricated. Their performances are then evaluated using confocal microscopy, fast camera imaging, and side-view imaging techniques. Using a device with a curvature angle of 180, we have achieved a standard deviation of +/- 0.45 mu m in particle focal position and a coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.37% in flow cytometric measurements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best CV that has been achieved using a microfluidic flow cytometry device. Moreover, the device showed the capability to distinguish 8 peaks when subjected to a stringent 8-peak rainbow calibration test, signifying the ability to perform sensitive, accurate tests similar to commercial flow cytometers. We have further tested and validated our device by detection of HEK-293 cells. With its advantages in simple fabrication (i.e., single-layered device), precise 3D hydrodynamic focusing (i.e., submicrometer precision along both lateral and vertical directions), and high detection resolution (i.e., low CV), our method could serve as an important basis for high-performance, mass-producible microfluidic flow cytometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据