4.2 Article

Alterations of Amino Acid Level in Depressed Rat Brain

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY & PHARMACOLOGY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 371-376

出版社

KOREAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY & PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.5.371

关键词

Amino acids; Behavior; Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress; Depression; LC-MS/MS

资金

  1. Ministry of National Science and Technique (China) [2012ZX09103201-026]
  2. Innovation Team of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine [2011-CXTD-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amino-acid neurotransmitter system dysfunction plays a major role in the pathophysiology of depression. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of amino acids as a source of neuro-specific biomarkers could be used in future diagnosis of depression. Only partial amino acids such as glycine and asparagine were determined from certain parts of rats' brain included hippocampi and cerebral cortex in previous studies. However, according to systematic biology, amino acids in different area of brain are interacted and interrelated. Hence, the determination of 34 amino acids through entire rats' brain was conducted in this study in order to demonstrate more possibilities for biomarkers of depression by discovering other potential amino acids in more areas of rats' brain. As a result, 4 amino acids (L-aspartic acid, L-glutamine, taurine and gamma -amino-n-butyric acid) among 34 were typically identified as potentially primary biomarkers of depression by data statistics: Meanwhile, an antidepressant called Fluoxetine was employed to verify other potential amino acids which were not identified by data statistics. Eventually, we found L- alpha -amino-adipic acid could also become a new potentially secondary biomarker of depression after drug validation. In conclusion, we suggested that L-aspartic acid, L-glutamine, taurine, gamma -amino-n-butyric acid and L- alpha -amino-adipic acid might become potential biomarkers for future diagnosis of depression and development of antidepressant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据