4.7 Article

Optimal granularity selection based on cost-sensitive sequential three-way decisions with rough fuzzy sets

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 131-144

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.019

关键词

Sequential three-way decisions; Rough fuzzy sets; Cost-sensitive; Hierarchical granular structure; Granularity optimization

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB1000905, 2016QY01W0200]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61572091, 61472056, 61772096, 61876201]
  3. High-End Talent Project [RC2016005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an extension of Pawlak's rough sets, rough fuzzy sets is proposed to deal with the target concept which is typically fuzzy or uncertain. It is worthwhile to introduce cost-sensitive learning into granular computing, as the granularity with the optimal cost can be selected. In the terms of decision making, test cost and decision cost are the most popular cost types. In the sequential three-way decisions (S3WD) models, the granularity is sensitive to the test cost. Meanwhile, the accuracy is sensitive to the decision cost. Selecting an optimal cost-sensitive granularity for problem solving is helpful for achieving optimal results at the lowest total cost in S3WD. However, it is difficult to evaluate test cost precisely and objectively in real-life applications, and existing works only focus on searching for the total cost as the objective function. In this paper, we firstly present a sequential three-way decisions model with rough fuzzy sets (S3WDRFS). Then, for S3WDRFS and its three regions, the changing rules of their decision cost are revealed in a hierarchical granular structure. By considering user requirements, we propose an optimization mechanism to achieve the optimal cost-sensitive granularity selection based on S3WDRFS model. Finally, the experimental results demonstrate that exemplary optimal granularities can be obtained for high quality decision-making under certain constraints. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据