4.5 Article

Effect of a novel sterilization method on biomechanical properties of soft tissue allografts

期刊

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 3971-3975

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3221-0

关键词

Allograft; Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanics; Stiffness; Strength

资金

  1. Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ, USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluate allograft tissue commonly used in soft tissue reconstruction to determine whether stiffness and strength were significantly altered after grafts were treated with different sterilization methods. Unprocessed, irradiated, and grafts treated with supercritical CO2 were compared. Thirty-eight anterior or posterior tibialis tendons were obtained from a tissue bank (Allograft Innovations, Gainesville, FL). Group I was unprocessed, group II was sterilized with gamma irradiation (20-28 kGy), and group III was sterilized with supercritical CO2. The grafts were pretensioned to 89 N for 300 s. Specimens were then loaded from 50 to 300 N at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles before being loaded to failure at 50 mm/min. Dependent variables were compared between sterilization groups with one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and equivalence trial. There was no significant difference in load to failure or failure stress among groups I, II, and III. Group III resulted in 27-36 % lower stiffness than group I and II. This difference was significant at 1, 10, 50, 100, and 250 cycles. There was no significant difference in stiffness between group I and group II. The two sterilization methods tested in this study do not affect allograft strength. The supercritical CO2 sterilization method resulted in significantly lower stiffness than unprocessed and irradiated allografts. However, the stiffness and strength of all groups tested were greater than that of published values of the native intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). This study provides previously unpublished mechanical test data on a new sterilization technique that will assist surgeons to decide which allograft to use in ACL reconstruction surgery. III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据