4.7 Review

Advances in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and related podocyte injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 86, 期 2, 页码 275-285

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.17

关键词

endothelial dysfunction; placenta; podocyturia; pre-eclampsia

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [K08HD051714]
  2. National Institute on Aging (VDG) [P50AG44170]
  3. Office of Women's Health Research, Building Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health [K12HD065987]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder that may lead to serious maternal and fetal complications. It is a multisystem disease that is commonly, but not always, accompanied by proteinuria. Its cause(s) remain unknown, and delivery remains the only definitive treatment. It is increasingly recognized that many pathophysiological processes contribute to this syndrome, with different signaling pathways converging at the point of systemic endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria. Different animal models of pre-eclampsia have proven utility for specific aspects of pre-eclampsia research, and offer insights into pathophysiology and treatment possibilities. Therapeutic interventions that specifically target these pathways may optimize pre-eclampsia management and may improve fetal and maternal outcomes. In addition, recent findings regarding placental, endothelial, and podocyte pathophysiology in pre-eclampsia provide unique and exciting possibilities for improved diagnostic accuracy. Emerging evidence suggests that testing for urinary podocytes or their markers may facilitate the prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. In this review, we explore recent research regarding placental, endothelial, and podocyte pathophysiology. We further discuss new signaling and genetic pathways that may contribute to pre-eclampsia pathophysiology, emerging screening and diagnostic strategies, and potential targeted interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据