4.7 Article

Intrarenal ghrelin receptors regulate ENaC-dependent sodium reabsorption by a cAMP-dependent pathway

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 501-508

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.187

关键词

ghrelin; hypertension; kidney; obesity; sodium; sodium; channels

资金

  1. UVA Department of Medicine Research Initiation Funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main distal nephron segment sodium transporters are the distal tubule chlorothiazide-sensitive sodium chloride cotransporter (NCC) and the collecting duct amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). The infusion of ghrelin into the renal interstitium stimulates distal nephron-dependent sodium reabsorption in normal rats, but the mechanism is unknown. Here we localize renal ghrelin receptors (GR) to the cortical collecting duct (CCD). Ghrelin significantly increased phosphorylated serum/glucocorticoidregulated kinase-1 (pSGK1), a major upstream signaling intermediate regulating ENaC. To test whether increased apical membrane alpha ENaC induced the antinatriuresis, ghrelin was infused in the presence of acute and chronic amiloride, a selective inhibitor of ENaC. In the presence of amiloride, renal interstitial ghrelin failed to reduce urine sodium excretion, suggesting that ghrelin-induced sodium reabsorption is dependent on intact ENaC activity. While the main sodium transporter of the CCD is ENaC, NCC is also present. In response to renal interstitial ghrelin infusion, neither total nor phosphorylated NCC levels are altered. Ghrelin-induced sodium reabsorption persisted in the presence of chlorothiazide (selective inhibitor of NCC), indicating that intact NCC activity is not necessary for ghrelin-induced antinatriuresis. Finally, renal interstitial ghrelin infusion significantly increased interstitial cAMP levels and adenylyl cyclase blockade abolished ghrelin-induced antinatriuresis. Thus, GRs expressed in the CCD regulate sodium reabsorption by cAMP-induced trafficking of ENaC to the apical membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据