4.7 Article

The serum anion gap is altered in early kidney disease and associates with mortality

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 82, 期 6, 页码 701-709

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2012.196

关键词

kidney disease; mortality; uremic toxins

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants [K23DK078774, R21DK077326, R01DK087783, RO1DK080123]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR025750, KL2RR025749, TL1RR025748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that uremia causes an increase in the serum anion gap (AG); however, whether changes in the AG occur earlier in the course of chronic kidney disease is not known. Here we investigated whether different measures of the AG, as a marker of kidney function, are associated with mortality. To do this, we analyzed the available laboratory data of 11,957 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 to calculate AG using the traditional method, or one that was albumin-adjusted, as well as a full AG reflecting other electrolytes. A significant elevation in the traditional AG was seen only with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), whereas increases in the albumin-adjusted and full AG were found with eGFRs <60 or 90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively. Higher levels of each AG were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and eGFR. After adjustment for additional covariates including body mass index and comorbidities, higher levels of the albumin-adjusted and full AG were associated with mortality (relative hazard for the highest compared with the lowest quartile were 1.62 and 1.64, respectively). Thus, higher levels of AG are present in individuals with less advanced kidney disease than previously recognized, and are associated with increased risk of mortality. Further study is needed to identify the unmeasured anions and to determine their physiological significance. Kidney International (2012) 82, 701-709; doi:10.1038/ki.2012.196; published online 23 May 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据