4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 422-427

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.159

关键词

acute kidney injury; acute renal failure; dialysis; fluid accumulation; outcomes; recovery of kidney function

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK53411, R01-DK53413, K24 DK062849, R01-DK53412] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid accumulation is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. Here, we sought to determine if fluid accumulation is associated with mortality and non-recovery of kidney function in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury. Fluid overload was defined as more than a 10% increase in body weight relative to baseline, measured in 618 patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter observational study. Patients with fluid overload experienced significantly higher mortality within 60 days of enrollment. Among dialyzed patients, survivors had significantly lower fluid accumulation when dialysis was initiated compared to non-survivors after adjustments for dialysis modality and severity score. The adjusted odds ratio for death associated with fluid overload at dialysis initiation was 2.07. In non-dialyzed patients, survivors had significantly less fluid accumulation at the peak of their serum creatinine. Fluid overload at the time of diagnosis of acute kidney injury was not associated with recovery of kidney function. However, patients with fluid overload when their serum creatinine reached its peak were significantly less likely to recover kidney function. Our study shows that in patients with acute kidney injury, fluid overload was independently associated with mortality. Whether the fluid overload was the result of a more severe renal failure or it contributed to its cause will require clinical trials in which the role of fluid administration to such patients is directly tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据