4.7 Article

Interaction between variants of two glycosyltransferase genes in IgA nephropathy

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 190-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.99

关键词

C1GALT1; IgAN; interactive effect; ST6GALNAC2

资金

  1. NSFC [30825021, 30670981, 60234020, 60572086, 30625012]
  2. Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [985-2007-113]
  3. Ministry of Health, P. R. China [200802052]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2004CB518605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence points to the importance of aberrant O-glycosylated immunoglobulin A1 (IgA1) in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a disease widely considered to be a polygenic disorder. We earlier found that haplotypes in two key glycosyltransferase genes, C1GALT1 and ST6GALNAC2, were associated with susceptibility to IgAN. Here we measured the genetic interaction of variants in C1GALT1 and ST6GALNAC2 by applying FAMHAP software to analyze haplotype-haplotype interaction in IgAN. As confirmation, we also used a novel divergence-based multi-locus algorithm (DBMA) approach to determine interactions between single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Haplotype-haplotype combinations in C1GALT1 and ST6GALNAC2 were significantly associated with a predisposition for IgAN and with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of patients. Analogously, results from DBMA found a five-locus combination, two in ST6GALNAC2 and three in C1GALT1, which was associated with IgAN predisposition, eGFR, and renal outcome of patients with IgAN. In addition, patients with a high risk had significantly more exposed N-acetylgalactosamine on their IgA1 than did patients with a lower risk of developing this disease. Our findings suggest that potential genetic interactions of C1GALT1 and ST6GALNAC2 variants influence IgA1 O-glycosylation, disease predisposition, and disease severity, and may contribute to the polygenic nature of IgAN. Kidney International (2009) 76, 190-198; doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.99; published online 8 April 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据