4.7 Article

Kidney injury molecule-1 expression in transplant biopsies is a sensitive measure of cell injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 608-614

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002697

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK038452-160006, R21 DK074099, P01 DK038452, R01 DK039773, R01 DK039773-24, DK 72381, R37 DK039773, DK 39773, R01 DK072381-05, R01 DK072381, R33 DK074099, R01 DK072381-04, DK 74099, DK 38452, R33 DK074099-05, R01 DK039773-21] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a specific histological biomarker for diagnosing early tubular injury on renal biopsies. In this study, KIM-1 expression was quantitated in renal transplant biopsies by immunohistochemistry and correlated with renal function. None of the 25 protocol biopsies showed detectable tubular injury on histologic examination, yet 28% had focal positive KIM-1 expression. Proximal tubule KIM-1 expression was present in all biopsies from patients with histological changes showing acute tubular damage and deterioration of kidney function. In this group, higher KIM-1 staining predicted a better outcome with improved blood urea nitrogen ( BUN), serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over an ensuing 18 months. KIM-1 was expressed focally in affected tubules in 92% of kidney biopsies from patients with acute cellular rejection. By contrast, there was little positive staining for Ki-67, a cell proliferation marker, in any of the groups. KIM-1 expression significantly correlated with serum creatinine and BUN, and inversely with the eGFR on the biopsy day. Our study shows that KIM-1 staining sensitively and specifically identified proximal tubular injury and correlated with the degree of renal dysfunction. KIM-1 expression is more sensitive than histology for detecting early tubular injury, and its level of expression in transplant biopsies may indicate the potential for recovery of kidney function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据