4.5 Article

The ACTIVE Cognitive Training Interventions and the Onset of and Recovery from Suspected Clinical Depression

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbp061

关键词

ACTIVE; Depression; Randomized controlled trial; Speed of processing

资金

  1. ACTIVE Cognitive Training Trial
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Hebrew Senior-Life [NR04507]
  4. Indiana University [NR04508]
  5. Johns Hopkins University [AG14260]
  6. New England Research Institutes [AG14282]
  7. Pennsylvania State University [AG14263]
  8. University of Alabama at Birmingham [AG 14289]
  9. University of Florida [AGO 14276]
  10. Posit Science Corporation
  11. Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice at the Iowa City VAMC
  12. Department of Veterans Affairs
  13. Veterans Health Administration
  14. Health Services Research and Development Service [HFP 04-149]
  15. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH [U01NR004507, U01NR004508] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  16. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [U01AG014263, U01AG014289, U01AG014260, U01AG014276, U01AG014282] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the effects or the 3 cognitive interventions fielded in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly study on 2 subsets of participants-1,606 without and 424 with suspected clinical depression at baseline. In the former group, only the speed of processing (vs. no-contact control) intervention had a significant effect, with its participants being 38% less likely to develop suspected clinical depression at I year (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62;p <.01). None of the interventions had a significant effect on recovery from suspected clinical depression in the latter group. Although the etiological mechanism of the speed of processing's protective effect was not isolated, it may result from successful adaptation to age-related changes through selective optimization with compensation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据