4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of dementia among Medicare beneficiaries

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/63.5.S328

关键词

dementia; health disparities; anti-dementia medication; Medicare beneficiaries

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K01AG022011, T32AG000262] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [T32AG000262, K01 AG022011, T32 AG000262, K01AG22011] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Numerous studies have documented disparities in health care utilization between non-Hispanic White and minority elders. We investigated differences in anti-dementia medication use between non-Hispanic White and minority community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with dementia. Methods. Using multivariate analysis with generalized estimating equations, we estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) for anti-dementia medication use by race/ethnicity for 1,120 beneficiaries with dementia from years 2001 through 2003 of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Results. After adjusting for demographics, socioeconomics, health care access and utilization, comorbidities, and service year, we found that anti-dementia medication use was approximately 30% higher among non-Hispanic Whites compared to other racial/ethnic groups (PR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.91). As for individual racial/ethnic groups, prevalence disparities remained significant for non-Hispanic Blacks (PR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57, 0.99) and non-Hispanic others (PR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26,. 0.96) but were attenuated tor Hispanics (PR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.59, 1.20). Discussion. Results provide evidence that racial/ethnic disparities in utilization of drugs used to treat dementia exist and are not accounted for by differences in demographic, economic, health Status, or health utilization factors. Findings provide a foundation for further research that should use larger numbers of minority patients and consider dementia type and severity. access to specialty dementia care, and cultural factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据