4.5 Article

Variations in body melanization impact desiccation resistance in Drosophila immigrans from Western Himalayas

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 276, 期 2, 页码 219-227

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00478.x

关键词

Cuticular melanization; desiccation resistance; rate of water loss; montane populations; Drosophila immigrans

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ectothermic species face problems of water balance under colder and drier climatic conditions in montane localities. We investigated five ecophysiological traits (body melanization, desiccation resistance, rate of water loss or gain and body size) in eight populations of Drosophila immigrans from an altitudinal gradient (600-2226 m) in the Western Himalayas. The traits showed bell-shaped variability patterns characteristic of quantitative traits. For body melanization, we observed high heritability (0.65) on the basis of parent-offspring regression. A comparison of highland versus foothill populations showed significant divergence for all the traits except body size. Darker flies from the highlands exhibited higher desiccation resistance but reduced rate of water loss or gain as compared with lighter flies from the foothills, which showed lower desiccation resistance and higher rates of water loss as well as gain. Lack of differences in the amount of epicuticular lipids cannot account for differential reduction in cuticular water loss in altitudinal populations. However, within- as well as between-population differences in body melanization can account for changes in desiccation resistance and reduction in cuticular water loss. Analyses of highland versus lowland populations as well as in assorted darker and lighter flies from a highland population have shown differences in haemolymph and dehydration tolerance. For the mechanistic basis of desiccation resistance, our results on wild populations of Drosophila immigrans are not in agreement with those reported for laboratory-selected desiccation-resistant strains in Drosophila melanogaster. Thus, ecophysiological mechanisms could be different under laboratory versus field selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据