4.5 Article

Help-Seeking Behavior of Women with Self-Reported Distressing Sexual Problems

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 461-468

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1133

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective was to describe the healthcare and information-seeking behavior of women with self-reported sexual problems and accompanying sexually related personal distress identified from a large, population-based U. S. survey. Methods: Women (n = 3,239) aged >= 18 years with self-reported sexual problems of desire, arousal, and/or orgasm accompanied by sexually related personal distress were identified from a cross-sectional mailed survey of 50,002 U. S. households sampled from a national research panel. Healthcare and information-seeking behavior was examined as four ordered categories: sought formal medical advice, sought informal advice, sought information from anonymous sources, and did not seek help or information. Correlates of help seeking for each type of distressing sexual problem were modeled with multivariable proportional odds regression. Results: Just over a third of women with any distressing sexual problems had sought formal care, most often from a gynecologist or primary care physician; about 80% of the time, the woman, rather than the physician, initiated the conversation. Only 6% of women who sought medical advice scheduled a visit specifically for a sexual problem. Factors related to help seeking were having a current partner and interacting with the heathcare system. Barriers were poor self-perceived health and embarrassment about discussing sexual topics with a physician. Conclusions: Our results suggest inadequacies in the U. S. medical care system in addressing sexual problems in women. Gynecologists and primary care physicians, by including discussions about sexual health during routine visits, can increase the likelihood that adequate care can be offered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据