4.3 Article

Improving Efficiency of the Bayesian Approach to Water Distribution Contaminant Source Characterization with Support Vector Regression

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000323

关键词

Water distribution systems; Bayesian analysis; Pollutants; Water-distribution systems; Bayesian analysis; Support vector regression; Contaminant source characterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are multiple sources of uncertainties in urban water-distribution systems, e.g.,nodal water demand and sensor measurement error. All of these uncertainties increase the complexity of contaminant source identification in a sparse sensor network. The large number of attributes (e.g.,contaminant source location, magnitude, injection starting time, and duration) of a contaminant event profile cannot be identified given limited sensor data. Instead, the uncertainties in the contaminant event profile need to be characterized. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods for Bayesian analyses allow for the characterization of the uncertainty in the contamination event profile. To account for stochastic water demands, which has been shown in some circumstances to be necessary if the contaminant event is to be properly characterized, the evaluation of the likelihood function is the most computationally expensive part of the MCMC implementation. Previous work applied Monte Carlo methods for error propagation (MCEP). The research reported in this paper investigates the application of support vector regression (SVR) to speed the likelihood evaluation. This coupled MCMC-SVR approach enables probabilistic inference of the contaminant event. An SVR model, which maps from the contaminant event space to the likelihood space, is built for each node in the network to evaluate the likelihood function during the MCMC chain evolution. For the case study investigated, MCMC-SVR is computationally feasible and robust in inferring the contaminant event. A comparison between MCMC-SVR and MCMC-MCEP reveals that there is no substantial difference between the inferences provided by the two models, whereas the former is more computationally efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据