4.6 Article

Lymphocyte and Antibody Responses Reduce Enterovirus 71 Lethality in Mice by Decreasing Tissue Viral Loads

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 13, 页码 6477-6483

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00434-09

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Taiwan National Health Research Institute [NHRI-EX96-9530NI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) infects the central nervous system and causes death and long-term neurological sequelae in hundreds of thousands of young children, but its pathogenesis remains elusive. Immunopathological mechanisms have been suspected to contribute to the pathogenesis of neurological symptoms, so anti-inflammatory agents have been used to treat patients with neurological symptoms. The present study was therefore designed to investigate the functions of lymphocyte and antibody responses in EV71 infection using a mouse model. Immunohistochemical staining analysis revealed virus and three types of lymphocytes, B cells, CD4 T cells, and CD8 T cells, in the spinal cord of an EV71-infected patient who died. A study of mice showed that the levels of virus and lymphocytes in brains and antibody titers in sera were elevated during the time when the mice succumbed to death in a phenomenon analogous to that observed in patients. Further studies demonstrated that after infection, the disease severity, mortality, and tissue viral loads of mice deficient in B, CD4 T, or CD8 T cells were significantly higher than those of wild-type mice. In addition, treatment with a virus-specific antibody, but not a control antibody, before or after infection significantly reduced the disease severity, mortality, and tissue viral loads of mice deficient in B cells. Our results show that both lymphocyte and antibody responses protect mice from EV71 infection. Our study suggests the use of vaccines and virus-specific antibodies to control fatal outbreaks and raises caution over the use of corticosteroids to treat EV71-infected patients with neurological symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据