4.6 Article

High Frequencies of Virus-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Precursors

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 24, 页码 12907-12916

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01722-09

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U. S. National Institutes of Health [U19-AI-057330, RO1-AR-35506, R37-AI-17672, T32 AI07349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A productiveCD8(+) T-cell response to a viral infection requires rapid division and proliferation of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells. Tetramer-based enrichment assays have recently given estimates of the numbers of peptide-major histocompatibility complex-specific CD8(+) T cells in naive mice, but precursor frequencies for entire viruses have been examined only by using in vitro limiting-dilution assays (LDAs). To examine CD8(+) T-cell precursor frequencies for whole viruses, we developed an in vivo LDA and found frequencies of naive CD8(+) T-cell precursors of 1 in 1,444 for vaccinia virus (VV) (similar to 13,850 VV-specific CD8(+) T cells per mouse) and 1 in 2,958 for lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) (similar to 6,761 LCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells per mouse) in C57BL/6J mice. In mice immune to VV, the number of VV-specific precursors, not surprisingly, dramatically increased to 1 in 13 (similar to 1,538,462 VV-specific CD8(+) T cells per mouse), consistent with estimates of VV-specific memory T cells. In contrast, precursor numbers for LCMV did not increase in VV-immune mice (1 in 4,562, with similar to 4,384 LCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells per VV-immune mouse). Using H-2D(b)-restricted LCMV GP33-specific P14-transgenic T cells, we found that, after donor T-cell take was accounted for, approximately every T cell transferred underwent a full proliferative expansion in response to LCMV infection. This high efficiency was also seen with memory populations, suggesting that most antigen-specific T cells will proliferate extensively at a limiting dilution in response to infections. These results show that frequencies of naive and memory CD8(+) T cell precursors for whole viruses can be remarkably high.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据