4.1 Article

Epidemiological Characteristics of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium from Healthy Pigs in Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 61-66

出版社

JAPAN SOC VET SCI
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.09-0041

关键词

epidemiology; Salmonella; swine

资金

  1. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan
  2. Grant-in-Aid for Matching Fund Subsidy for Private Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We characterized 53 Salmonella enterica ser. Typhimurium Strains recovered from healthy pigs during 1998-1999 (n=12) and 2004-2005 (n=41) as to their carriage of DT104 spacer region, class I and 2 integrons, virulence genes (spvC, rck, and pefA), and Xbal- and BlnI-Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles. No DT104 strain was detected in 1998-1999, whereas 65.9% (27/41) of the strains in 2004-2005 were DT104 showing resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides, tetracycline, and cephaloridine (R-type ACSSuT+). Class 1 intergron-associated genes, aadA2 (1.0-kbp amplicon) and pseI (1.2-kbp amplicon), were found in all the DT104 strains (27/27). One strain showing resistance to streptomycin, sulfionamides, tetracyclin, and trimethoprim (R-type SsuTTm) harbored another class I integron-associated gene (dhfrXII-orfF-aadA2.) on 1.9-kbp amplicon. Virulence gene spvC was found in 92.5% (49/53) and rck and pefA were found in 88.7%(47/53) of the strains, whereas spvC, rck, and pefA were found in all the DT104 strains. Ser. Typhimurium strains were categorized into four clusters (X1, X2, X3, and X4a/X4b) by Xba1-PFGE, or into nine clusters (B1, B2, B3a/B3b, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9a/B9b) by BlnI-PFGE analyses. DT104 strains were restricted into X2, or into B2, B3a/B3b, and B6 clusters, indicating that our multidrug-resistant DT104 strains from healthy pigs might have derived from at least three independent clones, with the most widespread clone being the cluster B6 strains isolated in Kanto, Tokai, Chugoku, and Kyushu regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据