4.5 Article

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 1046-U479

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.088

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a useful tool in characterizing carotid plaque vulnerability, but large studies are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess carotid MRI features of vulnerable plaque in a large study and the changes in carotid plaque morphology with respect to time since the neurological event. Methods: We included 161 patients with carotid plaque more than 3 mm thick. All patients underwent carotid MRI to obtain 3-T high-resolution magnetic resonance sequences. Large lipid core, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), fibrous cap rupture (FCR), and gadolinium enhancement (GE) were assessed and classified as present or absent. Prevalences of these features were then compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and time since stroke. Results: Seven patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Of the remaining 154 patients, 52 were symptomatic and 102 were asymptomatic. The prevalences of IPH (39 vs 16%; P = .002), FCR (30 vs 9%; P = .001), and GE (75 vs 55%; P = .015) were significantly higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients. After multivariate analysis, the prevalences of IPH (odds ratio, 2.6; P = .023) and FCR (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .038) were still significantly higher. The prevalence of IPH was significantly higher in symptomatic patients with plaque regardless of the time since the neurological event. For FCR, the difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was significant only during the first 15 days after the neurological event. Conclusions: Carotid MRI can identify plaque features that are associated with symptomatic presentation and may be indicative of plaque vulnerability. These features may ultimately be used in the management of extracranial carotid stenosis. (J Vasc Surg 2013;57:1046-51.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据