4.0 Article

Interaction between Angiotensin II, Osteoprotegerin, and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-gamma in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 209-217

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000163019

关键词

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Angiotensin II; AT1 receptor; PPAR-gamma; Smooth muscle cells; Osteoprotegerin; Metalloproteinase 9

资金

  1. National Institute of Health, USA [RO1 HL080010-01]
  2. NHMRC [379600, 431503]
  3. National Heart Foundation of Australia. [PF05B2217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) has been associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm ( AAA) expansion. Angiotensin II (AngII) receptor blockade has been shown to reduce OPG expression in human AAA tissue. Interaction between vascular AngII and OPG was further examined using cell culture and the AngII-infused ApoE(-/-) mouse AAA model. The ability of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma(PPAR gamma) activation to target OPG as potential therapy for AAA was also investigated. Methods and Results: Human aortic smooth muscle cells (AoSMC) exposed to AngII exhibited dose-dependent increase in the production OPG. A 3-fold increase in suprarenal aortic concentration of OPG was observed in AngII-infused ApoE(-/-) mice. AngII type 1 receptor expression in human AAA tissue, and AoSMC in vitro, was stimulated up 4-fold in the presence of OPG. This effect in AoSMC was counteracted in the presence of the PPAR gamma ligand, pioglitazone. Addition of PPAR gamma ligand to cultured human AAA explant reduced OPG secretion by 60% and tissue concentration of OPG and metalloproteinase 9 by 2- and 3-fold, respectively. Administration of pioglitazone to AngII-infused ApoE(-/-) mice significantly reduced aortic concentrations of OPG and metalloproteinase 9. Conclusions: These data support an interaction between AngII and OPG in aneurysm formation. Activation of PPAR gamma may have a role in treatment of AAA. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据